This Old Code

By now everyone  has heard that  Microsoft was going to  pay someone to update Wikipedia entries,  at this time I don't think they did any thing wrong.  If you read the Wikipedia articles many of them have a slant and its a sin for some one with first hand knowledge to make corrections.  I have seen the Wikipedia content zares at work, adding an article  for dasBlog, and one for adding a link to dasblog to the Weblog Software article.  Take a look, I'll wait.

Now tell me how to 3 deletes win over 5 keeps? This is a serious problem many people are starting to rely on Wikipedias data, Its almost like Google where if you or your product does not show up it just doesn't exist.  Yet these self appointed hall monitors are completely unaccountable for the inaccurate information that they allow to be published.  In fact it may be worse considering Wikipedia's preference is for inaccurate information over expert accurate information.  Wikipedia is a flawed resource which is a real danger.  with luck some one will sue and put an end to it.( it was a neat idea and very promising.)