<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>This Old Code - InstallShield</title>
    <link>http://thisoldcode.net/</link>
    <description>(Architecture + Development) ^ Testing = Product </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Aaron Fischer</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:04:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.0.7226.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>aaron@microfisch.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>aaron@microfisch.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://thisoldcode.net/Trackback.aspx?guid=1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://thisoldcode.net/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://thisoldcode.net/PermaLink,guid,1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Fischer</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://thisoldcode.net/CommentView,guid,1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://thisoldcode.net/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Let me start by saying I hate InstallShield,  this probably isn't fair there
was a time when I liked them back in the day when the name of the product matched
the name of the company they were small and focused.  They installed software
and it made life easy.  Now MacoVision has different ideas and IMHO ruined the
InstallShield the product.  
</p>
        <p>
I started the other day by reading <a href="http://www.shahine.com/omar/CommentView,guid,762ed8b6-39d9-49dc-be4a-70e130d654a8.aspx#commentstart" target="_blank">Shahine's
blog regarding InstallShield updater</a>,  he found a nice resource to <a href="http://consumer.installshield.com/kb.asp?id=Q111006" target="_blank">remove
this product</a>.  The trouble is, InstallShield updater keeps coming back. 
Case inpoint yesterday evening I saw <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2007/01/27/nikon-raw-codec.aspx" target="_blank">Steve's
post</a> about <a href="http://nikonimglib.com/nefcodec/" target="_blank">Nikon's
RAW codex in vista</a> so having a Nikon D50 I went and happily down loaded and
installed the codex.  This morning I see that installation has once again turned
on Install Shield Updater.  I tend to agree with Shahine I hate updaters the
only one I don't really mind is windows update (in vista it's almost nice). 
On the other hand I have to give credit to MacoVision the idea of one common update
framework/resource is compelling(They charge an arm and leg for it though). 
But These things should never be silently installed behind the users back. 
Getting your customers to stay uptodate is a very difficult problem, I don't think
a unique solution per company is the right choice but InstallShield updater sure comes
up wanting.
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <p>
ps,
</p>
        <p>
This was my first post from windows live writer.  My initial impression is the
spell check could be much better.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://thisoldcode.net/aggbug.ashx?id=1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124" />
        <br />
        <hr />
This weblog is sponsored by <a href="http://www.MicroFisch.com">MicroFisch</a>.</body>
      <title>But The Cat Came Back The Very Next Day</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisoldcode.net/PermaLink,guid,1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://thisoldcode.net/PermaLink,guid,1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:04:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Let me start by saying I hate InstallShield,&amp;nbsp; this probably isn't fair there
was a time when I liked them back in the day when the name of the product matched
the name of the company they were small and focused.&amp;nbsp; They installed software
and it made life easy.&amp;nbsp; Now MacoVision has different ideas and IMHO ruined the
InstallShield the product.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I started the other day by reading &lt;a href="http://www.shahine.com/omar/CommentView,guid,762ed8b6-39d9-49dc-be4a-70e130d654a8.aspx#commentstart" target="_blank"&gt;Shahine's
blog regarding InstallShield updater&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp; he found a nice resource to &lt;a href="http://consumer.installshield.com/kb.asp?id=Q111006" target="_blank"&gt;remove
this product&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The trouble is, InstallShield updater keeps coming back.&amp;nbsp;
Case inpoint yesterday evening I saw &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2007/01/27/nikon-raw-codec.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Steve's
post&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;a href="http://nikonimglib.com/nefcodec/" target="_blank"&gt;Nikon's
RAW codex in vista&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;so having a Nikon D50 I went and happily down loaded and
installed the codex.&amp;nbsp; This morning I see that installation has once again turned
on Install Shield Updater.&amp;nbsp; I tend to agree with Shahine I hate updaters the
only one I don't really mind is windows update (in vista it's almost nice).&amp;nbsp;
On the other hand I have to give credit to MacoVision the idea of one common update
framework/resource is compelling(They charge an arm and leg for it though).&amp;nbsp;
But These things should never be&amp;nbsp;silently installed behind the users back.&amp;nbsp;
Getting your customers to stay uptodate is a very difficult problem, I don't think
a unique solution per company is the right choice but InstallShield updater sure comes
up wanting.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ps,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This was my first post from windows live writer.&amp;nbsp; My initial impression is the
spell check could be much better.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://thisoldcode.net/aggbug.ashx?id=1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
This weblog is sponsored by &lt;a href="http://www.MicroFisch.com"&gt;MicroFisch&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
      <comments>http://thisoldcode.net/CommentView,guid,1b4d44c9-dfaa-46ca-b1fd-fffbf69a0124.aspx</comments>
      <category>My Life</category>
      <category>Ramblings</category>
      <category>InstallShield</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>