I receive an error when trying to install

“Security Update for SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2(KB948109)

A security issue has been identified in the SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2 that could allow an attacker to compromise your system and gain control over it. You can help protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer.

The windows installer error message that shows up in my event log is:

Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - Update 'GDR 3068 for SQL Server Database Services 2005 ENU (KB948109)' could not be installed. Error code 1603.

The kb known issues do not seem to align with my error.

Known issues with this security update

•
If the Microsoft SQL Server 2005 installation or the SQL Server 2005 Express Edition installation is an upgrade from an earlier version of SQL Server, you should review the "Known issues with this security update" section in one of the following articles in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

948110 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948110/) MS08-040: Description of the security update for SQL Server 2000 GDR and MSDE 2000: July 8, 2008

948111 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948111/) MS08-040: Description of the security update for SQL Server 2000 QFE and MSDE 2000: July 8, 2008

•
You may receive an error message when you try to uninstall this update. For more information about this issue, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

955250 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955250/) Error message when you try to uninstall a SQL Server 2005 Express Edition hotfix package: "1731 The source installation package for the product [2] is out of sync with the client package"

Down loaded the Update and did a manual install: Security Update for SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2 (KB948109)

I also see an error from the MsiInstaller:

Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 -- Error 1920. Service 'SQLWriter' (SQLWriter) failed to start.  Verify that you have sufficient privileges to start system services.

Followed these instructions on all MSSQL.n\setups in the registry:

SQL server uses local group for ACLs. When the server is installed the groups are created and their SIDs are stored in the registry. Somewhere along the way, the SID had to change and the SIDs in the registry were not valid anymore. Try to delete the values for the following values in Setup registry key the instance hive [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\Setup]

The registry values are:

AGTGroup

SQLGroup

FTSGroup

ASGroup

Thanks,
Samuel Lester (MSFT)

Followed these instructions to reinstall sqlwriter:

I had the same problem, and I found an easier way:

Browse your SQL 2005 installation CD, and in the setup folder you should see a file called SQLWriter.msi (It may be in a subfolder of the setup folder - I can't remember the exact location).

Execute the msi file - it will install the missing SQL 2005 VSS Writer service.

After that your SP2 installation should succeed.

Now I have successfully Installed the hotfix.

When you set a DataGrid’s datasoure to a LinqDataSource control you still need to handle the paging event in your code behind file.  It’s also worth noting that the DataGrid does not use the Linq skip and take paging functionality.  The DataGrid will simply request all results and page them in memory.

When you over load the OnSelecting event you do not need to specify a datacontext or TableName or other query specific properties.

When you specify a css class for your GridView’s PagerStlye (PagerStyle.CssClass=”pagerStyleClass”) the rendered table row class font-size.

You will need to select the child table of this tr element  in your css

.pagerStyleClass Table{font-size: 10px;}

I am starting to suspect VB.net 2008 is not saving all my changes.  This is not a good sign.  Maybe this will be fixed in SP1.  I hope a lot of my VB headaches will go a way with SP1

So there is this little petition online ADO .NET Entity Framework Vote of No Confidence.  Which seems to have evoked a response from the Entity Framework team.

But I don’t care to be talked down to by the  so called experts.  “Warning” poor old me not to use technology that does not fit their.  It seems obvious to them that all domain’s and software shops are the same, and I clearly  cannot evaluate a framework.( Maybe this is true, I am on windows after all.  But then what does that say about them?)

There are cases where the Entity Framework will prove most useful.  While POCO can be nice, it’s not always what I am looking for.  Some times I do actually need data storage. And some times persistence ignorance is not a benefit.

I would like to thank Kathleen and Julie for their contrarily posts to the petition.

Kathleen Dollard: Entity Framework Petition 

Julie Lerman: Oh that no-confidence vote on E.F.

What happens when it rains?

Amazon S3 and data corruption. Thread: S3 data corruption?

We've isolated this issue to a single load balancer that was brought into service at 10:55pm PDT on Friday, 6/20.  It was taken out of service at 11am PDT Sunday, 6/22.  While it was in service it handled a small fraction of Amazon S3's total requests in the US.  Intermittently, under load, it was corrupting single bytes in the byte stream.  When the requests reached Amazon S3, if the Content-MD5 header was specified, Amazon S3 returned an error indicating the object did not match the MD5 supplied.  When no MD5 is specified, we are unable to determine if transmission errors occurred, and Amazon S3 must assume that the object has been correctly transmitted. Based on our investigation with both internal and external customers, the small amount of traffic received by this particular load balancer, and the intermittent nature of the above issue on this one load balancer, this appears to have impacted a very small portion of PUTs during this time frame.
One of the things we'll do is improve our logging of requests with MD5s, so that we can look for anomalies in their 400 error rates.  Doing this will allow us to provide more proactive notification on potential transmission issues in the future, for customers who use MD5s and those who do not. In addition to taking the actions noted above, we encourage all of our customers to take advantage of mechanisms designed to protect their applications from incorrect data transmission.  For all PUT requests, Amazon S3 computes its own MD5, stores it with the object, and then returns the computed MD5 as part of the PUT response code in the ETag.  By validating the ETag returned in the response, customers can verify that Amazon S3 received the correct bytes even if the Content MD5 header wasn't specified in the PUT request.  Because network transmission errors can occur at any point between the customer and Amazon S3, we recommend that all customers use the Content-MD5 header and/or validate the ETag returned on a PUT request to ensure that the object was correctly transmitted.  This is a best practice that we'll emphasize more heavily in our documentation to help customers build applications that can handle this situation.
If you have specific questions or concerns about how your application might have been affected, please feel free to e-mail us at aws@amazon.com.

When I used the 3.0 Firefox installer I have a version that reports 2.0.0.14  that's messed up.

I have been working on moving a lot of inline styles to a separate CSS page today.  There are some asp:datagrid that I would like to control paging(number of pages, page mode…) and other settings in one configuration location rather then each page.  I just realized I was looking for MVC.